Nr Intescue
6.78
105
I pass this letter without having had time to get to it more than cursorily through the contents.
As to the changes which he brings against his J. Downing, the Caldwell & then in H. Kong, I do not think there is much beside what he has already given to the public in a more convenient form in his lecture at Newcastle & in his pamphlet "Crime & Punishment at H. K." which you have doubtless seen.
There are however some of his publishing points which I do not concur concerning ourselves.
1. It was not thought here that the suspension of the Anstey was conducted as he alleges in par. 105. in violation of established rules. Nor do I know what he means by the allegation. It would seem to imply that the word "before the Comml" (Cor. ¶. 81) means that he must bring bodily before the Committee: but I have never so understood the word, where the defence is in writing.
}
f
Nr Intescue
6.78
105
I pass this letter without Laving
had time ar get to ds more than cursorily through the contents.
до
As to the changes which de hängs against his J. Downing, die Caldwell & then in H. Kong, I do not think there is much besider what he has already firm to the public in a more convenient form in his
steach at Newraith & in his hutistes
か
tamphlet "hime & fomenment at W. K"
Lave doubtles seen.
which
you
There are Lowern on or his
pulimining points come
1. It was hot
what he
comerning
elves.
thought here that
the suspension of die Anstey was conducted as he allyn in par. 105. in violation of statlished unles. Nor do I know chais
means by the allegation. It would seem to mickly that the word "defas himself. lifer the Commil" (Cor. Ay. 81) mean that he must I hought bodily before theloumist: hot I have near myself
so understood the wall, where the
defove is in
widing.
D
M
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.